Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CRH plc
How CRH plc stacks up
CRH · against 32 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #21 of 33 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CRH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 17.4% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.3% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.6% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 33 reported | 6.3% | 7.1% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 28 reported | 17.4% | 59.7% | 15% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 33 reported | 4.6% | 3.6% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 53.3B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 84.6B USD | 95 | 82 | |
| 5 | 43.6B USD | 93 | 81 | |
| 17 | 35.5B USD | 75 | 60 | |
| 18 | 1.75T MXN (≈$94.4B) | 73 | 79 | |
| 19 | 45.5B USD | 68 | 47 | |
| 20 | 263.2B HKD (≈$33.7B) | 62 | 71 | |
| 21 | 62.2B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 22 | 36.9B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 23 | 85.4B USD | 57 | 46 | |
| 24 | 82.7B USD | 54 | 45 | |
| 25 | 224.6B CNY (≈$31.4B) | 51 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score