Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CQP · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #360 of 399 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CQP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CQP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 19.17× | 0.49× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.33 | 0.48 | 61% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 1.22× | 1.37× | 42% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 356 | 8.4B EUR (≈$9.3B) | 11 | 38 | |
| 357 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 412M USD |
| 11 |
| 42 |
| 358 | 66.1B USD | 10 | 45 |
| 359 | 534M USD | 10 | 38 |
| 360 | 30.5B USD | 10 | 57 |
| 361 | 4.5B HKD (≈$576M) | 10 | 19 |
| 362 | 306M USD | 9 | 48 |
| 363 | 3.5B USD | 9 | 16 |
| 364 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 9 | 36 |