Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CQP · against 45 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #46 of 46 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)1 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CQP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CQP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 47 reported | 19.17× | 0.38× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 46 reported | 0.33 | 0.44 | 58% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 45 reported | 1.22× | 1.32× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 904.0B TWD (≈$28.0B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 22.9B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 4 | 29.1B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 93 | 62 | |
| 42 | 17.6B USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 43 | 58.3B USD | 15 | 51 | |
| 44 | 58.0B USD | 14 | 48 | |
| 45 | 18.1B USD | 11 | 53 | |
| 46 | 30.5B USD | 10 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score