Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc.
How Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. stacks up
CPS · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #287 of 362 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score27 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including CPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 93% of peers. Return on assets: -3.0% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 76% of peers. Operating margin: 2.3% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 5.7% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | 5.7% | 9.5% | 34% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 2.3% | 7.1% | 27% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | -3.0% | 4.1% | 14% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | Not reported | 11.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 11.7% | 36.0% | 8% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 283 | 17.5B USD | 20 | 18 | |
| 285 | 77.5B USD | 19 | 26 | |
| 285 | 7.6B USD | 19 | 21 | |
| 287 | 1.5B USD | 18 | 22 | |
| 287 | 365M USD | 18 | 20 | |
| 289 | 474M USD | 17 | 30 | |
| 290 | 383M USD | 16 | 40 | |
| 290 | 10.9B USD | 16 | 47 | |
| 290 | 232M USD | 16 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score