Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Capri Holdings Limited
How Capri Holdings Limited stacks up
CPRI · against 407 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #282 of 408 · scores higher than 30% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CPRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 406 reported | 6.5% | 5.6% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 417 reported | 6.2% | 9.7% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 4.0% | 6.1% | 31% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 3.1% | 53.8% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 277 | 2.4B USD | 38 | 47 | |
| 277 | 1.5B USD | 38 | 63 | |
| 282 | 131.5B INR (≈$1.6B) | 37 | 55 | |
| 282 | 60.1B THB (≈$1.7B) | 37 | 39 | |
| 282 | 2.1B USD | 37 | 30 | |
| 282 | 1.2B USD | 37 | 33 | |
| 286 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 36 | 40 | |
| 286 | 77.4B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 36 | 50 | |
| 286 | 32.4B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 36 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score