Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Copa Holdings, S.A.
How Copa Holdings, S.A. stacks up
CPA · against 443 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #247 of 444 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score55 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CPA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 445 reported | 5.0% | 6.5% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 387 reported | 10.5% | 8.7% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 439 reported | 6.9% | 6.6% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 239 | 10.0B EUR (≈$10.9B) | 56 | 54 | |
| 239 | 6.7B USD | 56 | 69 | |
| 247 | 29.4B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 55 | 65 | |
| 247 | 22.8B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 55 | 49 | |
| 247 | 5.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 247 | 6.4B CHF (≈$7.4B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 247 | 10.3B USD | 55 | 57 | |
| 252 | 92.2B TWD (≈$2.9B) | 54 | 52 | |
| 252 | 816.2B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 54 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score