Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COST · against 151 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #19 of 152 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score22 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including COST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | COST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 147 reported | 43.8% | 8.5% | 95% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 152 reported | 3.8% | 5.8% | 40% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 152 reported | 10.2% | 4.4% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 145 reported | 28.4% | 10.3% | 89% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 154 reported | 12.8% | 35.5% | 12% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 115.8B USD | 99 | 47 | |
| 1 | 300.3B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 1 | 927M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 98 | 74 | |
| 5 | 2.8B USD | 97 | 57 | |
| 14 | 2.0B USD | 93 | 84 | |
| 16 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 343.3B USD |
| 92 |
| 52 |
| 16 | 6.1B USD | 92 | 61 |
| 18 | 4.1B USD | 91 | 64 |
| 19 | 417.7B USD | 90 | 52 |
| 19 | 21.8B USD | 90 | 66 |
| 19 | 3.6B USD | 90 | 60 |
| 19 | 131.3B USD | 90 | 53 |
| 23 | 1.2B USD | 89 | 83 |