Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ConocoPhillips
How ConocoPhillips stacks up
COP · against 187 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Growth
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #101 of 188 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including COP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -1.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.1% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = COP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | COP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 9.6% | 7.9% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | 5.1% | 2.9% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | -1.7% | 1.0% | 38% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around COP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 98 | 1.0B USD | 58 | 24 | |
| 98 | 3.8B USD | 58 | 21 | |
| 98 | 6.8B USD | 58 | 70 | |
| 101 | 52.4B USD | 57 | 47 | |
| 101 | 173.5B USD | 57 | 65 | |
| 103 | 2.0B USD | 56 | 39 | |
| 103 | 64.0B USD | 56 | 37 | |
| 105 | 1.1B USD | 55 | 26 | |
| 105 | 534M USD | 55 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score