Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CON · against 230 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #219 of 231 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 7
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CON · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 223 reported | 4.23× | 0.24× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 230 reported | 0.63 | 0.53 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 223 reported | 1.38× | 2.60× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 100 | |
| 215 | 5.7B USD | 10 | 30 | |
| 216 | 12.7B AUD (≈$8.4B) | 10 | 38 | |
| 217 | 3.0B USD | 9 | 35 | |
| 218 | 4.7B USD | 9 | 42 | |
| 219 | 5.1B USD | 7 | 54 | |
| 220 | 4.2B USD | 7 | 41 | |
| 221 | 18.7B CNY (≈$2.6B) | 6 | 51 | |
| 222 | 8.8B USD | 6 | 31 | |
| 223 | 7.3B USD | 6 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score