Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COMP · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #673 of 760 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including COMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | COMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | -4.0% | 3.4% | 7% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | -2.6% | 26.8% | 11% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 0.8% | 2.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | 3.6% | 5.2% | 42% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 14.2% | 53.9% | 13% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 5 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 673 | 26M HKD (≈$3M) | 11 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 19 |
| 673 | 7.1B CNY (≈$998M) | 11 | 11 |
| 673 | 4.6B CNY (≈$640M) | 11 | 14 |
| 673 | 1.8B USD | 11 | 34 |
| 673 | 7.2B USD | 11 | 34 |
| 673 | 1.8B BRL (≈$315M) | 11 | 38 |
| 673 | 7.3B USD | 11 | 23 |
| 673 | 233M CAD (≈$170M) | 11 | 29 |
| 681 | 4.5B CNY (≈$623M) | 10 | 26 |