Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Columbia Sportswear Company
How Columbia Sportswear Company stacks up
COLM · against 317 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #135 of 318 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including COLM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = COLM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | COLM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 318 reported | 5.4% | 5.4% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 326 reported | 10.0% | 9.5% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 135 reported | 9.0% | 5.9% | 70% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 321 reported | 44.7% | 43.3% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around COLM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 131 | 15.3B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 60 | 50 | |
| 131 | 5.1B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 131 | 5.2B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 135 | 520.9B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 59 | 71 | |
| 135 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 59 | |
| 135 | 4.2B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 135 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 59 | 65 | |
| 139 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 58 | 71 | |
| 139 | 1.6B GBP (≈$2.1B) | 58 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score