Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cohen & Steers, Inc.
How Cohen & Steers, Inc. stacks up
CNS · against 80 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #54 of 81 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 85 reported | 7.4% | 9.8% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 66 reported | 3.0% | 10.4% | 29% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 78 reported | 4.5% | 10.2% | 27% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 59 | |
| 2 | 45.3B HKD (≈$5.8B) | 95 | 40 | |
| 3 | 5.7B EUR (≈$6.3B) | 94 | 50 | |
| 3 | 3.0B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 230.3B INR (≈$2.8B) | 92 | ||
| 49 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 45 | 76 | |
| 51 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 52 | |
| 52 | 22.8B SEK (≈$2.3B) | 41 | 51 | |
| 53 | 82.3B THB (≈$2.3B) | 40 | 60 | |
| 54 | 3.8B USD | 34 | 58 | |
| 54 | 90.1B THB (≈$2.5B) | 34 | 57 | |
| 56 | 403.2B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 33 | 67 | |
| 56 | 3.4B EUR (≈$3.7B) | 33 | 39 | |
| 58 | 4.4B USD | 31 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score