Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cohen & Steers, Inc.
How Cohen & Steers, Inc. stacks up
CNS · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #117 of 154 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 7.4% | 10.5% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 3.0% | 11.4% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 4.5% | 11.5% | 24% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 113 | 685M USD | 37 | 68 | |
| 114 | 14.1B USD | 36 | 57 | |
| 115 | 13.7B USD | 35 | 42 | |
| 115 | 38.4B USD | 35 | 22 | |
| 117 | 3.8B USD | 34 | 58 | |
| 118 | 219M USD | 32 | 20 | |
| 119 | 852M USD | 31 | ||
| 119 | 4.4B USD | 31 | 32 | |
| 121 | 433M USD | 30 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score