Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNO · against 851 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #687 of 852 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score85 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including CNO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | CNO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 930 reported | 6.0% | 8.7% | 42% | Context only | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 829 reported | -4.1% | 16.0% | 19% | 100% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 905 reported | 5.9% | 8.3% | 37% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.2B HKD (≈$8.2B) | 95 | 91 | |
| 1 | 689M HKD (≈$88M) | 95 | 90 | |
| 1 | 34.9B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 95 | ||
| 1 | 28.2B HKD (≈$3.6B) | 95 | 50 | |
| 1 | 166M MYR (≈$36M) | 95 | 82 | |
| 687 | 616.1B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 19 | 27 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 687 |
| 380M USD |
| 19 |
| 61 |
| 687 | 1.26T INR (≈$15.1B) | 19 | 51 |
| 687 | 16.7B USD | 19 | 34 |
| 687 | 5.3B USD | 19 | 24 |
| 687 | 27.1B NOK (≈$2.6B) | 19 | 49 |
| 687 | 1.4B USD | 19 | 43 |
| 695 | 10.8B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 18 | 49 |
| 695 | 32.4B JPY (≈$220M) | 18 |