Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CMS Energy Corporation
How CMS Energy Corporation stacks up
CMS · against 55 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 56 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score7 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Utilities peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -4.3% vs peer median 1.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 79% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 56 reported | 9.9% | 6.4% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 51 reported | -4.3% | 6.0% | 18% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 55 reported | 2.7% | 3.3% | 43% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.3B GBP (≈$14.7B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 2 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 3 | 15.4B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 4 | 921.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 5 | 76.7B MYR (≈$16.9B) | 91 | 58 | |
| 32 | 20.7B EUR (≈$22.7B) | 60 | 48 | |
| 32 | 37.6B USD | 60 | 43 | |
| 35 | 85.8B CNY (≈$12.0B) | 57 | 42 | |
| 35 | 30.5B USD | 57 | 45 | |
| 37 | 22.0B USD | 56 | 44 | |
| 38 | 200.5B CNY (≈$28.1B) | 55 | 44 | |
| 39 | 19.7B USD | 52 | 46 | |
| 39 | 15.5B USD | 52 | 72 | |
| 41 | 18.7B USD | 51 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score