Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Consumers Energy Company
How Consumers Energy Company stacks up
CMS-PB · against 358 other Utilities companies
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #236 of 359 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CMS-PB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.4% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMS-PB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMS-PB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 356 reported | Not reported | 5.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 15.9% | 8.6% | 90% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 164 reported | Not reported | -1.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 341 reported | 223.1% | 64.7% | 95% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMS-PB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.8B BRL (≈$497M) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 32.24T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 3 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 6.8B CNY (≈$945M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 3 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 232 | 3.5B USD | 35 | 53 | |
| 232 | 439M USD | 35 | 63 | |
| 236 | 8.5B CAD (≈$6.2B) | 34 | 43 | |
| 236 | 70.7B USD | 34 | 40 | |
| 236 | Unavailable | 34 | 38 | |
| 236 | 3.0B USD | 34 | 44 | |
| 240 | 17.9B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 33 | 41 | |
| 240 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 33 | 43 | |
| 240 | 29.4B USD | 33 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score