Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CMPS · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,186 of 1,373 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CMPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CMPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.65× | 0.24× | 25% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 2.55 | 0.53 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 1.29× | 2.62× | 20% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,182 | 13.2B USD | 14 | 30 | |
| 1,183 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 16.9B USD |
| 14 |
| 37 |
| 1,184 | 1.5B USD | 14 | 53 |
| 1,185 | 1.4B USD | 14 | 73 |
| 1,186 | 1.2B USD | 14 |
| 1,187 | 22.0B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 14 | 51 |
| 1,188 | 427.8B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 13 | 52 |
| 1,189 | 1.26T USD | 13 | 62 |
| 1,190 | 6.9B CNY (≈$967M) | 13 | 46 |