Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CMG · against 68 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #50 of 69 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CMG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | CMG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 3.3% | 4.0% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | 4.9% | 6.6% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 3.7% | 4.1% | 41% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 5.2% | 14.4% | 18% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 4 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 5 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 88 | 55 | |
| 46 | 3.38T JPY (≈$23.0B) | 32 | 67 | |
| 47 | 39.0B AUD (≈$25.7B) | 31 | 60 | |
| 47 | 57.0B USD | 31 | 52 | |
| 47 | 74.3B USD | 31 | 66 | |
| 50 | 42.1B USD | 30 | 58 | |
| 51 | 72.66T KRW (≈$52.3B) | 29 | 32 | |
| 51 | 24.6B USD | 29 | 56 | |
| 51 | 49.1B USD | 29 | 15 | |
| 51 | 72.8B USD | 29 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score