Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Columbus McKinnon Corporation
How Columbus McKinnon Corporation stacks up
CMCO · against 939 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
7/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #845 of 940 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score125 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including CMCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 7?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 96% of peers. Return on assets: -6.8% vs peer median 3.1%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 92% of peers. Operating margin: -9.6% vs peer median 7.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 88% of peers. Return on invested capital: -3.1% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 910 reported | -3.1% | 4.9% | 18% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 936 reported | -9.6% | 6.2% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 905 reported | -6.8% | 2.0% | 5% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 893 reported | -27.7% | 5.5% | 7% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 945 reported | 35.1% | 23.4% | 75% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMCOScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score