Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cmb.Tech NV
How Cmb.Tech NV stacks up
CMBT · against 400 other Energy companies
Profitability
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #188 of 401 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including CMBT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets and return on invested capital than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 70% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 69% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.5% vs peer median 9.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 33.4% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMBT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 5.5% | 9.3% | 31% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 33.4% | 11.7% | 86% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | 1.9% | 4.4% | 30% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | 29.6% | 10.5% | 89% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 56.0% | 33.2% | 73% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMBT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 184 | 3.7B USD | 54 | 67 | |
| 184 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score