Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cmb.Tech NV
How Cmb.Tech NV stacks up
CMBT · against 117 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #12 of 118 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including CMBT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -93.6% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 24.9% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 77.2% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMBT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 119 reported | 77.2% | 0.8% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 96 reported | -93.6% | 2.0% | 1% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 116 reported | 24.9% | -0.7% | 94% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMBT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 5 | 5.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 6 | 7.0B USD | 96 | 44 | |
| 9 | 7.5B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 10 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 11 | 5.1B USD | 91 | 55 | |
| 12 | 5.0B USD | 90 | 46 | |
| 12 | 2.8B USD | 90 | 49 | |
| 12 | 7.5B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 15 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 16 | 9.2B USD | 88 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score