Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLVT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,477 of 1,698 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CLVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.94× | 0.26× | 17% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.39 | 0.84 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.85× | 1.83× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,473 | 30.5B CNY (≈$4.3B) | 13 | 39 | |
| 1,474 | 65.8B CNY (≈$9.2B) | 13 | 46 | |
| 1,475 | 38.9B CNY (≈$5.4B) | 13 | 30 | |
| 1,476 | 32.5B USD | 13 | 43 | |
| 1,477 | 1.3B USD | 13 | 37 | |
| 1,478 | 6.4B USD | 13 | 47 | |
| 1,479 | 182.9B USD | 13 | 58 | |
| 1,480 | 12.9B TWD (≈$400M) | 13 | 47 | |
| 1,481 | 8.2B TWD (≈$255M) | 13 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score