Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Celestica Inc.
How Celestica Inc. stacks up
CLS · against 119 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 120 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 1.7% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.7% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 4.1% | 3.2% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 5.7% | 5.0% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 1.7% | 3.1% | 27% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 114 reported | 19.0% | 17.0% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 59 | 20.2B USD | 56 | 50 | |
| 59 | 28.3B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 59 | 30.8B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 63 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 63 | 32.8B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 63 | 52.3B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 66 | 139.7B CNY (≈$19.6B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 67 | 150.4B CNY (≈$21.1B) | 53 | 65 | |
| 68 | 28.4B USD | 52 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score