Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Climb Global Solutions, Inc.
How Climb Global Solutions, Inc. stacks up
CLMB · against 607 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #251 of 608 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score57 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CLMB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLMB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLMB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 592 reported | 2.6% | 1.8% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 617 reported | 5.1% | 4.0% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 181 reported | 5.2% | 2.3% | 66% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 597 reported | 16.0% | 38.9% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLMB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 4 | 32.0B TWD (≈$990M) | 98 | 68 | |
| 251 | 6.3B CNY (≈$876M) | 57 | 49 | |
| 251 | 8.1B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 57 | 40 | |
| 251 | 39.4B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 57 | 59 | |
| 251 | 5.4B CNY (≈$761M) | 57 | 56 | |
| 251 | 791M USD | 57 | 64 | |
| 251 | 631M USD | 57 | 42 | |
| 251 | 702M USD | 57 | 55 | |
| 251 | 854M USD | 57 | 74 | |
| 259 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 56 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score