Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Clean Harbors, Inc.
How Clean Harbors, Inc. stacks up
CLH · against 230 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #129 of 231 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CLH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 15.9% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 232 reported | 5.1% | 6.1% | 45% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 213 reported | 15.9% | 11.8% | 59% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 229 reported | 5.3% | 6.1% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 4 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 125 | 22.4B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 128 | 10.3B USD | 55 | 57 | |
| 129 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 54 | 50 | |
| 129 | 11.2B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 129 | 15.6B USD | 54 | 50 | |
| 129 | 12.0B USD | 54 | 48 | |
| 129 | 19.0B EUR (≈$20.9B) | 54 | 56 | |
| 134 | 173.2B CNY (≈$24.2B) | 53 | 58 | |
| 134 | 10.3B USD | 53 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score