Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLFD · against 600 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #60 of 601 · scores higher than 90% of peers · safety percentile 91
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)66 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CLFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 566 reported | 0.04× | 0.21× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 583 reported | 2.14 | 0.66 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 600 reported | 12.53× | 1.90× | 98% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 4 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 99 | 52 | |
| 56 | 2.5B CNY (≈$344M) | 92 | 65 | |
| 57 | 376M USD | 92 | 48 | |
| 57 | 852M USD | 92 | 38 | |
| 59 | 730M USD | 91 | 50 | |
| 60 | 443M USD | 91 | 41 | |
| 61 | 5.3B CNY (≈$737M) | 91 | 26 | |
| 62 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 91 | 49 | |
| 63 | 5.4B CNY (≈$754M) | 90 | 34 | |
| 64 | 3.2B CNY (≈$442M) | 90 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score