Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLBT · against 424 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #192 of 425 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 54
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)47 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CLBT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLBT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 414 reported | 0.04× | 0.26× | 81% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 409 reported | 1.01 | 0.94 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 421 reported | 1.62× | 1.85× | 40% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 188 | 108.0B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 189 | 3.9B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 190 | 16.5B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 54 | 32 | |
| 191 | 794.8B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 54 | 42 | |
| 192 | 3.1B USD | 54 | 67 | |
| 193 | 610.1B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 53 | 47 | |
| 194 | 49.8B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 53 | 51 | |
| 195 | 16.6B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 196 | 4.1B AUD (≈$2.7B) | 53 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score