Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLB · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #219 of 399 · scores higher than 45% of peers · safety percentile 45
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CLB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.59× | 0.49× | 43% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 1.14 | 0.48 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 2.12× | 1.37× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 215 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 46 | 39 | |
| 216 | 2.6B USD | 46 | 30 | |
| 217 | 433.8B BRL (≈$78.1B) | 46 | 41 | |
| 218 | 1.9B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 219 | 448M USD | 45 | 42 | |
| 220 | 30.1B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 45 | 23 | |
| 221 | 921M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 45 | 32 | |
| 222 | 6.2B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 223 | 5.9B ILS (≈$1.6B) | 44 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score