Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLB · against 80 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #48 of 81 · scores higher than 41% of peers · safety percentile 45
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CLB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CLB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 78 reported | 0.59× | 0.55× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 78 reported | 1.14 | 0.47 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 82 reported | 2.12× | 1.42× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 526M USD | 95 | 36 | |
| 4 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 5 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 94 | 34 | |
| 44 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 50 | 61 | |
| 45 | 881M USD | 48 | 31 | |
| 46 | 428M USD | 47 | 57 | |
| 47 | 755M USD | 46 | 41 | |
| 48 | 448M USD | 45 | 42 | |
| 49 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 43 | 60 | |
| 50 | 2.2B CNY (≈$314M) | 42 | 26 | |
| 51 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 42 | 80 | |
| 52 | 16.2B THB (≈$453M) | 41 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score