Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CL · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #724 of 802 · scores higher than 10% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)81 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 13.88× | 0.44× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.32 | 0.32 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.03× | 1.53× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 720 | 2.9B USD | 10 | 20 | |
| 721 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 549M NOK (≈$52M) |
| 10 |
| 26 |
| 722 | 3.5B SAR (≈$938M) | 10 | 24 |
| 723 | 73M AUD (≈$48M) | 10 | 33 |
| 724 | 76.2B USD | 10 | 43 |
| 725 | 1.18T KRW (≈$851M) | 10 | 57 |
| 726 | 6.0B CNY (≈$835M) | 9 | 22 |
| 727 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 9 | 36 |
| 728 | 187.1B USD | 9 | 54 |