Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CompX International Inc.
How CompX International Inc. stacks up
CIX · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #128 of 473 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CIX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CIX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CIX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 5.0% | 3.0% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 7.8% | 6.3% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 4.9% | 3.3% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 33.2% | 32.3% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CIX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 124 | 6.8B USD | 58 | 26 | |
| 124 | 3.9B USD | 58 | 71 | |
| 124 | 4.7B USD | 58 | 63 | |
| 124 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 55 | |
| 128 | 436M USD | 57 | 73 | |
| 128 | 3.5B USD | 57 | 40 | |
| 128 | 75.3B USD | 57 | 39 | |
| 128 | 21.3B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 132 | 4.2B USD | 56 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score