Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CIGI · against 136 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #109 of 137 · scores higher than 21% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)28 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CIGI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CIGI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 136 reported | 1.16× | 0.81× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 135 reported | 1.22 | 0.86 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 134 reported | 1.19× | 0.89× | 61% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 4 | 60.5B HKD (≈$7.7B) | 94 | 54 | |
| 5 | 3.0B USD | 92 | 78 | |
| 105 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 24 | 38 | |
| 106 | 7.9B USD | 24 | 54 | |
| 107 | 2.9B USD | 23 | 68 | |
| 108 | 4.8B USD | 23 | 52 | |
| 109 | 5.3B USD | 23 | 51 | |
| 110 | 477.5B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 22 | 42 | |
| 111 | 3.8B USD | 22 | 41 | |
| 112 | 3.5B USD | 21 | 59 | |
| 113 | 2.8B USD | 21 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score