Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CIG · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #71 of 360 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 81
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CIG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CIG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 0.78× | 1.21× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.11 | 0.40 | 85% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 1.17× | 1.05× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 67 | 75.9B JPY (≈$516M) | 82 | 73 | |
| 68 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 81 | 73 | |
| 69 | 186.6B INR (≈$2.2B) | 81 | 59 | |
| 70 | 4.6B BRL (≈$828M) | 81 | 88 | |
| 71 | 5.1B USD | 81 | 75 | |
| 72 | 85.8B CNY (≈$12.0B) | 80 | 42 | |
| 73 | 24.1B EUR (≈$26.6B) | 80 | 57 | |
| 74 | 493.8B CLP (≈$543M) | 80 | 66 | |
| 75 | 8.5B CAD (≈$6.2B) | 79 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score