Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CIG · against 93 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #11 of 94 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 81
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CIG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CIG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 94 reported | 0.78× | 1.13× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 90 reported | 0.11 | 0.43 | 90% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 90 reported | 1.17× | 1.02× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2.70T CLP (≈$3.0B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 14.6B BRL (≈$2.6B) | 93 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.4B USD | 93 | 43 | |
| 5 | 29.9B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 92 | 65 | |
| 7 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 48 | |
| 8 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 89 | 70 | |
| 9 | 5.4B USD | 84 | 77 | |
| 10 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 81 | 73 | |
| 11 | 5.1B USD | 81 | 75 | |
| 12 | 8.5B CAD (≈$6.2B) | 79 | 43 | |
| 13 | 797.6B INR (≈$9.6B) | 79 | 57 | |
| 14 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 78 | 43 | |
| 15 | 6.1B AUD (≈$4.0B) | 77 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score