Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chime Financial, Inc.
How Chime Financial, Inc. stacks up
CHYM · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,324 of 1,708 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score171 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including CHYM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 82% of peers. Return on invested capital: -4.6% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 79% of peers. Operating margin: -2.1% vs peer median 6.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 77% of peers. Return on assets: -0.9% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHYM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHYM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | -4.6% | 6.8% | 18% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | -2.1% | 6.3% | 21% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | -0.9% | 2.9% | 23% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | -1.3% | 7.5% | 25% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 88.7% | 33.4% | 98% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHYM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1,324 | 4.3B CNY (≈$595M) | 22 | 34 | |
| 1,324 | 51.6B JPY (≈$351M) | 22 | 33 | |
| 1,324 | 8.2B TWD (≈$255M) | 22 | 22 | |
| 1,324 | 412M USD | 22 | 43 | |
| 1,324 | 10.7B USD | 22 | 59 | |
| 1,324 | 260M GBP (≈$339M) | 22 | ||
| 1,324 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 22 | 23 | |
| 1,341 | 2.8B CNY (≈$397M) | 21 | 12 | |
| 1,341 | 4.9B CNY (≈$685M) | 21 | 20 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score