Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
How Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. stacks up
CHT · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #281 of 471 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 7.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.2% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 3.4% | 3.0% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 7.2% | 8.7% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 4.4% | 7.6% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | Not reported | 48.9% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 276 | 264.1B USD | 41 | 59 | |
| 276 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score