Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CHSCL · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #372 of 802 · scores higher than 54% of peers · safety percentile 54
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CHSCL · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CHSCL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.33× | 0.44× | 56% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | Not reported | 0.32 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.47× | 1.53× | 47% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 368 | 4.4B CNY (≈$619M) | 54 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 369 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 54 | 19 |
| 370 | 6.9B CNY (≈$968M) | 54 | 31 |
| 371 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 54 | 75 |
| 372 | Unavailable | 54 | 30 |
| 373 | 393.3B KRW (≈$283M) | 54 | 68 |
| 374 | 6.7B CNY (≈$935M) | 53 | 22 |
| 375 | 679.4B CLP (≈$747M) | 53 | 63 |
| 376 | 42.3B JPY (≈$288M) | 53 | 65 |