Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CHS Inc.
How CHS Inc. stacks up
CHSCL · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #130 of 148 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score19 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including CHSCL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -8.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHSCL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHSCL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 3.8% | 4.1% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | Not reported | 4.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | -8.9% | 3.5% | 6% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHSCL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 124 | 275M USD | 18 | 42 | |
| 127 | 6.9B USD | 17 | 36 | |
| 127 | 1.6B USD | 17 | 43 | |
| 127 | 983M USD | 17 | 35 | |
| 130 | Unavailable | 16 | 30 | |
| 130 | 23.6B USD | 16 | 48 | |
| 130 | 8.2B USD | 16 | 17 | |
| 133 | 1.4B USD | 15 | 22 | |
| 133 | 275M USD | 15 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score