Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
How Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. stacks up
CHKP · against 186 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #128 of 187 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score27 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CHKP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 28.3% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHKP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHKP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 189 reported | 6.3% | 16.2% | 20% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 159 reported | 28.3% | 19.0% | 57% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 185 reported | 5.4% | 10.4% | 34% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHKP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 123 | 14.4B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 123 | 11.9B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 126 | 66.3B CNY (≈$9.3B) | 53 | 32 | |
| 126 | 16.6B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 128 | 14.5B USD | 52 | 68 | |
| 128 | 13.6B USD | 52 | 52 | |
| 128 | 13.3B USD | 52 | 76 | |
| 131 | 11.3B USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 131 | 7.4B USD | 51 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score