Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chegg, Inc.
How Chegg, Inc. stacks up
CHGG · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #141 of 799 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including CHGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -73.8% vs peer median 4.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -9.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 100% of peers. EBITDA yield: 160.7% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHGG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -73.8% | 4.5% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 160.7% | 8.9% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | -9.6% | 6.3% | 6% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 164.5% | 54.4% | 91% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHGG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 141 | 320.1B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 82 | 47 | |
| 141 | 447M EUR (≈$491M) | 82 | 57 | |
| 141 | 207.1B TRY (≈$6.2B) | 82 | 73 | |
| 141 | 93.0B MXN (≈$5.0B) | 82 | 52 | |
| 141 | 72M USD | 82 | 26 | |
| 141 | 1.8B CAD (≈$1.3B) | 82 | 75 | |
| 149 | 72.9B HKD (≈$9.3B) | 81 | 61 | |
| 149 | 5.9B TWD (≈$182M) | 81 | 64 | |
| 149 | 135.8B JPY (≈$924M) | 81 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score