Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chegg, Inc.
How Chegg, Inc. stacks up
CHGG · against 45 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
82/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #16 of 46 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including CHGG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -73.8% vs peer median 4.5%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -9.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 100% of peers. EBITDA yield: 160.7% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHGG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHGG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | -73.8% | 2.7% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 160.7% | 12.5% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 28 reported | -9.6% | 5.5% | 15% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 45 reported | 164.5% | 134.0% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHGG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 2 | 847M HKD (≈$108M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 2 | 444M HKD (≈$57M) | 98 | 74 | |
| 2 | 197.0B KRW (≈$142M) | 98 | 64 | |
| 12 | 78M CHF (≈$90M) | 93 | 39 | |
| 13 | 379M MYR (≈$83M) | 88 | 87 | |
| 14 | 420M HKD (≈$54M) | 87 | 65 | |
| 15 | 166.2B KRW (≈$120M) | 84 | 41 | |
| 16 | 72M USD | 82 | 26 | |
| 17 | 621M BRL (≈$112M) | 81 | 45 | |
| 18 | 129M EUR (≈$142M) | 80 | 37 | |
| 19 | 306M MYR (≈$67M) | 79 | 52 | |
| 20 | 336M MYR (≈$74M) | 77 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score