Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chagee Holdings Limited
How Chagee Holdings Limited stacks up
CHA · against 389 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
80/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #83 of 390 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including CHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 80?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.6% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 389 reported | 8.1% | 5.5% | 76% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 398 reported | 17.6% | 10.0% | 87% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 4.8% | 6.3% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 391 reported | 45.6% | 51.7% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 83 | 25.0B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 80 | 60 | |
| 83 | 11.4B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 80 | 63 | |
| 83 | 19.0B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 80 | 79 | |
| 83 | 1.7B SGD (≈$1.3B) | 80 | 83 | |
| 83 | 2.4B USD | 80 | 81 | |
| 83 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 80 | 53 | |
| 83 | 1.4B USD | 80 | 44 | |
| 90 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 79 | 61 | |
| 90 | 2.2B GBP (≈$2.8B) | 79 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score