Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CGC · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,107 of 1,373 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.40× | 0.24× | 37% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 2.44 | 0.53 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 3.04× | 2.62× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,103 | 66.3B USD | 20 | 30 | |
| 1,104 | 18.7B THB (≈$525M) | 20 | 55 | |
| 1,105 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 20 | 68 | |
| 1,106 | 234M USD | 19 | ||
| 1,107 | 318M USD | 19 | 26 | |
| 1,108 | 454M AUD (≈$299M) | 19 | 7 | |
| 1,109 | 133.4B JPY (≈$907M) | 19 | 53 | |
| 1,110 | 10.9B EUR (≈$11.9B) | 19 | 59 | |
| 1,111 | 356.9B USD | 19 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score