Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CGC · against 381 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #315 of 382 · scores higher than 18% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)31 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including CGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 351 reported | 0.40× | 0.19× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 366 reported | 2.44 | 0.45 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 376 reported | 3.04× | 2.97× | 51% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 3 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 4 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 5 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 311 | 62.7B JPY (≈$426M) | 20 | 40 | |
| 312 | 18.7B THB (≈$525M) | 20 | 55 | |
| 313 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 20 | 68 | |
| 314 | 234M USD | 19 | ||
| 315 | 318M USD | 19 | 26 | |
| 316 | 454M AUD (≈$299M) | 19 | 7 | |
| 317 | 200M USD | 19 | 30 | |
| 318 | 588M USD | 18 | 24 | |
| 319 | 3.5B CNY (≈$496M) | 17 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score