Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Centerra Gold Inc.
How Centerra Gold Inc. stacks up
CGAU · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #140 of 1,321 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including CGAU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 89?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.3% vs peer median 2.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 89% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.1% vs peer median 3.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 93% of peers. EBITDA yield: 26.2% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CGAU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CGAU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 11.1% | 3.8% | 89% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 26.2% | 8.6% | 93% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 0.3% | 2.6% | 39% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 58.4% | 61.0% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CGAU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 140 | 92.6B JPY (≈$630M) | 89 | 68 | |
| 140 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score