Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CEVA · against 598 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #50 of 599 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)65 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CEVA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CEVA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 571 reported | 0.05× | 0.21× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 572 reported | 1.93 | 0.67 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 596 reported | 10.12× | 1.83× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 5 | 3.8B CNY (≈$530M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 46 | 1.02T KRW (≈$733M) | 93 | 85 | |
| 47 | 15.2B TWD (≈$472M) | 92 | 24 | |
| 48 | 1.55T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 92 | 68 | |
| 49 | 4.9B CNY (≈$685M) | 92 | 27 | |
| 50 | 823M USD | 92 | 43 | |
| 51 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 92 | 61 | |
| 52 | 111.4B JPY (≈$757M) | 92 | 64 | |
| 53 | 4.7B HKD (≈$601M) | 92 | 45 | |
| 54 | 4.4B CNY (≈$619M) | 92 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score