Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Central Securities Corporation
How Central Securities Corporation stacks up
CET · against 71 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #43 of 72 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including CET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Financial Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 84% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.3% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 13.3% | 8.4% | 76% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | 2.2% | 6.7% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | Not reported | 7.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 105 reported | 110.7% | 88.3% | 64% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CET| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 66 | |
| 1 | 22.8B SEK (≈$2.3B) | 95 | 51 | |
| 3 | 3.2B USD | 94 | 66 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 93 | 47 | |
| 5 | 14.7B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 92 | 76 | |
| 39 | 3.0B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 39 | 1.5B USD | 50 | 59 | |
| 41 | 36.3B TWD (≈$1.1B) | 49 | 29 | |
| 41 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 49 | 50 | |
| 43 | 1.7B USD | 48 | ||
| 44 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 46 | 48 | |
| 45 | 1.1B USD | 44 | 37 | |
| 46 | 1.7B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 47 | 6.5B MYR (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score