Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CET · against 99 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #45 of 100 · scores higher than 56% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CET · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 87 reported | 0.00× | 0.57× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 105 reported | 0.74 | 0.65 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 97 reported | 0.55× | 2.14× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 99 | ||
| 2 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 3 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 4 | 21.21T IDR (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 5 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 41 | 2.1B USD | 55 | 45 | |
| 42 | 3.9B AUD (≈$2.6B) | 52 | 43 | |
| 43 | 832M USD | 51 | 17 | |
| 44 | 37.5B THB (≈$1.0B) | 51 | 58 | |
| 45 | 1.7B USD | 50 | ||
| 46 | 1.5B USD | 48 | ||
| 47 | 2.1B USD | 47 | 71 | |
| 48 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 46 | 48 | |
| 49 | 1.3B AUD (≈$862M) | 45 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score