Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CEPU · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #39 of 360 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CEPU · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CEPU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 0.33× | 1.21× | 87% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | -0.13 | 0.40 | 97% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 1.28× | 1.05× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 35 | 20.3B EUR (≈$22.4B) | 91 | 42 | |
| 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 230M USD |
| 90 |
| 37 |
| 37 | 5.1B CNY (≈$715M) | 90 | 29 |
| 38 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 48 |
| 39 | 1.5B USD | 89 | 93 |
| 40 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 89 | 70 |
| 41 | 23.3B USD | 89 | 78 |
| 42 | 9.0B BRL (≈$1.6B) | 89 | 83 |
| 43 | 5.2B CNY (≈$731M) | 88 | 54 |