Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Capstone Energy+, Inc.
How Capstone Energy+, Inc. stacks up
CEPL · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #141 of 473 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CEPL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 99% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CEPL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CEPL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | -106.8% | 3.0% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 5.4% | 6.3% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 3.0% | 3.3% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | -47.3% | 32.3% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CEPL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 132 | 1.1B USD | 56 | 56 | |
| 132 | 334M USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 132 | 8.5B USD | 56 | 66 | |
| 141 | 2.0B USD | 55 | 42 | |
| 141 | 97M USD | 55 | 44 | |
| 141 | 5.3B USD | 55 | 60 | |
| 141 | 984M USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 141 | 78.2B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 141 | 29.2B USD | 55 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score